wolf not guilty

It is crazy to think my client was even near the granny’s house at the time of this vicious double murder. Any claims that suggest his guilt for these crimes are fueled by bias, prejudice and their frankly not true. The only “proof” anyone has of the wolf’s guilt relies on the assumption that all wolves are big and bad which is essentially racism. The only people that saw the wolf on the day of the crime were the woodcutters in a different part of the forest altogether.


To commit the crime the person must’ve know that red was going to the house and that the only person living there was a defenseless granny how could the wolf know this

Why would a kid talk to a wolf that most of the towns people have been warned to stay away from but she wouldn’t talk to the lumberjacks

I trust you will make the right decision

this relies on thinking anything that doesn’t have witnesses can’t be proven